1.
Kaplan, Robert S. The Evolution of Management Accounting. Accounting Review. 1984;59(3). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=4490847&site=ehost-live
2.
H. Thomas J, Robert S. K. The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting. Published online 1987. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=4306297
3.
Kaplan RS. Management accounting (1984-1994): development of new practice and theory. Management Accounting Research. 1994;5(3-4):247-260. doi:10.1006/mare.1994.1015
4.
Otley D. Did Kaplan and Johnson get it right? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2008;21(2):229-239. doi:10.1108/09513570810854419
5.
Ahrens T, Becker A, Burns J, et al. The future of interpretive accounting research—A polyphonic debate. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 2008;19(6):840-866. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2006.07.005
6.
Baxter J, Chua WF. Alternative management accounting research—whence and whither. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2003;28(2-3):97-126. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00022-3
7.
Mitchell F. Research and practice in management accounting: improving integration and communication. European Accounting Review. 2002;11(2):277-289. doi:10.1080/09638180020017087
8.
Scapens RW. Understanding management accounting practices: A personal journey. The British Accounting Review. 2006;38(1):1-30. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2005.10.002
9.
Scapens RW. Researching management accounting practice: The role of case study methods. The British Accounting Review. 1990;22(3):259-281. doi:10.1016/0890-8389(90)90008-6
10.
Cooper, David J. Case Study Research in Accounting. Accounting Horizons. 2008;22(2). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=33142893&site=ehost-live
11.
Vaivio J. Qualitative management accounting research: rationale, pitfalls and potential. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management. 2008;5(1):64-86. doi:10.1108/11766090810856787
12.
Adcroft, Andy. The (un)intended outcome of public sector performance measurement. The International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2005;18(4/5):386-400. http://search.proquest.com/docview/234409173?accountid=16676
13.
de Bruijn, Hans. Performance measurement in the public sector: Strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement. The International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2002;15(6/7):578-594. http://search.proquest.com/docview/234402479/817446D95CF840F8PQ/12?accountid=16676
14.
Leeuw, Frans L. Performance auditing, new public management and performance improvement: questions and answers. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 1996;9(2). http://search.proquest.com/docview/211210114?accountid=16676
15.
Propper C. The Use and Usefulness of Performance Measures in the Public Sector. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2003;19(2):250-267. doi:10.1093/oxrep/19.2.250
16.
Adnett N, Davies P. Schooling reforms in England: from quasi-markets to co-opetition? Journal of Education Policy. 2003;18(4):393-406. doi:10.1080/0268093032000106848
17.
Ballantine J, Forker J, Greenwood M. THE GOVERNANCE OF CEO INCENTIVES IN ENGLISH NHS HOSPITAL TRUSTS. Financial Accountability & Management. 2008;24(4):385-410. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00459.x
18.
Conrad L, Guven Uslu P. UK health sector performance management: Conflict, crisis and unintended consequences. Accounting Forum. 2012;36(4):231-250. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2012.06.001
19.
Ellwood S. Full-cost pricing rules within the National Health Service internal market-accounting choices and the achievement of productive efficiency. Management Accounting Research. 1996;7(1):25-51. doi:10.1006/mare.1996.0002
20.
Wragg T, Haynes G, Chamberlin R, Wragg C. Performance-related pay: the views and experiences of 1,000 primary and secondary head teachers. Research Papers in Education. 2003;18(1):3-23. doi:10.1080/0267152032000048550
21.
Burns J, Scapens RW. Conceptualizing management accounting change: an institutional framework. Management Accounting Research. 2000;11(1):3-25. doi:10.1006/mare.1999.0119
22.
Kasurinen T. Exploring management accounting change: the case of balanced scorecard implementation. Management Accounting Research. 2002;13(3):323-343. doi:10.1006/mare.2002.0191
23.
Siti-Nabiha, A K. Stability and change: an institutionalist study of management accounting change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2005;18(1):44-73. http://search.proquest.com/docview/211215249?accountid=16676
24.
Howcroft D. Spreadsheets and the financial planning process: a case study of resistance to change. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change. 2006;2(3):248-280. doi:10.1108/18325910610690081
25.
Montano JLA, Donoso JA, Hassall T, Joyce J. Vocational skills in the accounting professional profile: the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) employers’ opinion. Accounting Education. 2001;10(3):299-313. doi:10.1080/09639280210122339
26.
Li Q, Luo W, Wang Y, Wu L. Firm performance, corporate ownership, and corporate social responsibility disclosure in China. Business Ethics: A European Review. 2013;22(2):159-173. doi:10.1111/beer.12013
27.
Finch N. The Motivations for Adopting Sustainability Disclosure. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published online 2005. doi:10.2139/ssrn.798724
28.
Accounting for Sustainability PART I: A review of academic literature. http://www.accountingforsustainability.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/A4S-Report-Part-1-A-review-of-academic-literature-Sa%C3%AFd-Business-School-Oxford-University.pdf
29.
The value of extrafinancial disclosure What investors and analysts said. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/The-value-of-extra-financial-disclosure.pdf
30.
The Private Finance Initiative in the National Health Service. http://www.cimaglobal.com/Documents/ImportedDocuments/tech_resrep_the_private_finance_initiative_in_the_national_health_service_2004.pdf
31.
De Vera MJ, Torio PC, Timbang MO, Siriban C. Asian Public-Private Partnerships: An Overview of Trends and Innovations. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published online 2013. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2221100
32.
Mu R, Jong M de, Koppenjan J. The rise and fall of Public–Private Partnerships in China: a path-dependent approach. Journal of Transport Geography. 2011;19(4):794-806. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.10.002